–Estefânia Maria de Queiroz Barboza, Constitutional Law Professor, Federal University of Paraná (UFPR); Gustavo Buss, PhD Candidate, Federal University of Paraná (UFPR)
Debates about judicial AI tend to fixate on whether algorithms, rather the judges, will end up writing judgments. This focus reflects a valid unease with the prospect of a ruling entirely authored by a machine with no human oversight. But it also narrows the conversation about AI in decision-making to the judgment document itself, while also implying that keeping humans, at least as arbitrators and proofreaders of AI suggestions, is enough to avoid it.
Our editorial team includes several staff writers, each contributing their specialized knowledge to enhance the depth and breadth of our event and story coverage.